HERMINA, a mistress of an old married man
Mortgaged to one Elisa a parcel of land
Owned by none than her common law husband,
To whom she had a child, a minor at that time.
And the husband’s children are the lawful heirs,
Including his daughter to her, but for being
A common law wife to Irene’s married father,
Minia, has no lawful stands whatsoever.
The subject goes like this… Although she has able
To pay then Elisa of her obligation,
Said mortgagee did not return to mortgagor
The collateral, of which, is the title therefore.
While she kept on waiting for Elisa to give
Back then the land title, something in an effect
Of what I can describe spurious document
And other materials, title has been transferred
To another person, whom Minia does not know
And had never met him, how come they could able
To do such, but without a confederation
That makes a wrongdoing lawful and possible?
How could a man who died in late 1990’s
Could ever able to sign any document
Assigning anyone as Representative,
After his death, of which was already nine years?
And, presuming that said aforementioned owner
Is alive at the time of signing documents
Giving Minia all the necessary papers
To apply for a loan his signatures is faked.
So, it’s clear as daylight that the new land title
Issued to one Anastacio is not genuine,
As it was transferred to his honorable name
By means of fraudulent and touch of golden hands.
Constant move to regain the subject landholding
Has done in court, but since Herminia and Irene
Can’t avail the legal services of Counsel,
How could they continue the fight without lawyer?
Since I know very well the issue as neighbor
And a family friend here in San Simon town,
What I had suggested, file another action
At the Office of DAR or Agrarian Reform;
The issue to resolve being a DAR dispute,
It should not be tried in any regular court
Since jurisdictional wise, none other but of course
Only the DAR has the full power to resolve.
And, how could the heirs of the fictitious owner
Who had filed a Perjury case against Irene,
Can take into her mouth anything does not her,
While in fact what she claimed belongs to another?
Your writer can disclosed the real story
How come the landholding or subject property,
Has been, what I can say, had transferred wrongfully
To one, not knowing what’s really behind maybe.
Accusing real heirs of registered owner
A perjury in court for telling what happened,
And where both of them were still a minor then,
Why they must not just work for it all together?
Possibly, said Elisa was then indebted
To Basilio, and that the still not surrendered
Land title was the one Elisa had transferred
To Basilio, just to close her outstanding debts.
Since the real culprit it could be Elisa,
That used to forge signatures ‘para kumita;’
Catch her and bring to Court the Queen of Estafa,
To testify for and in behalf of Minia!
