THE RECENT COA red flag raised over the construction of the Clark International Airport (CRK) control tower is deeply concerning, especially considering the strategic importance of this infrastructure to Central and Northern Luzon.
From my point of view, the first and foremost accountability lies with the government contract managers and project monitors. It is their mandate to strictly oversee project execution—ensuring timelines, quality standards, and contractual obligations are met.
Unfortunately, the lapse in performance monitoring allowed the contractor’s non-compliance and construction delays to go unchecked, ultimately compromising not only the timeline but also the integrity of the project delivery.
Secondly, this issue once again highlights systemic problems in our government’s bidding and procurement processes. It raises the question: Are we selecting the most capable contractors, or simply the lowest bidders? While transparency in public procurement is essential, it should not come at the cost of competence and project reliability.
It is my hope that this unfortunate episode serves as a wake-up call to correct and reform the mismanagement issues that continue to plague major infrastructure projects.
The CRK tower is not a minor undertaking it is a vital facility that directly impacts the safety, efficiency, and long-term viability of Clark International Airport. Its successful completion is crucial not just for Clark, but for the broader development of Central and Northern Luzon.
A modern and well-managed CRK must be able to coexist and complement other major airports in the country and the ASEAN region. This goal cannot be achieved without disciplined project management, accountability, and a merit-based procurement system.
Let us hope that those responsible are held accountable, corrective measures are swiftly implemented, and this vital project is finally completed in the way it was envisioned efficiently, transparently, and in service of the public good.
